what’s a BwO?

A body without organs is not an empty body stripped of organs, but a body upon which that which serves as organs (wolves, wolf eyes, wolf jaws?) is distributed according to crowd phenomena, in Brownian motion, in the form of molecular multiplicities. The desert is populous. Thus the body without organs is opposed less to organs as such than to the organization of the organs insofar as it composes an organism. The body without organs is not a dead body but a living body all the more alive and teeming once it has blown apart the organism and its organization. Lice hopping on the beach. Skin colonies. The full body without organs is a body populated by multiplicities.

breasts in every pore

Problems of peopling in the unconscious: all that passes through the pores of the schizo, the veins of the drug addict, swarming, teeming, ferment, intensities, races and tribes. This tale of white skin prickling with bumps and pustules, and of dwarfish black heads emerging from pores grimacing and abominable, needing to be shaved off every morning—is it a tale by Jean Ray, who knew how to bring terror to phenomena of micromultiplicity? And how about the “Lilliputian hallucinations” on ether? One schizo, two schizos, three: “There are babies growing in my every pore"—"With me, it’s not in the pores, it’s in my veins, little iron rods growing in my veins"—"I don’t want them to give me any shots, except with camphorated alcohol. Otherwise breasts grow in my every pore.” Freud tried to approach crowd phenomena from the point of view of the unconscious, but he did not see clearly, he did not see that the unconscious itself was fundamentally a crowd. He was myopic and hard of hearing; he mistook crowds for a single person. Schizos, on the other hand, have sharp eyes and ears. They don’t mistake the buzz and shove of the crowd for daddy’s voice. Once Jung had a dream about bones and skulls. A bone or a skull is never alone. Bones are a multiplicity.

one or several

“There is a desert. Again, it wouldn’t make any sense to say that I am in the desert. It’s a panoramic vision of the desert, and it’s not a tragic or uninhabited desert. It’s only a desert because of its ocher color and its blazing, shadowless sun. There is a teeming crowd in it, a swarm of bees, a rumble of soccer players, or a group of Tuareg. I am on the edge of the crowd, at the periphery; but I belong to it, I am attached to it by one of my extremities, a hand or foot. I know that the periphery is the only place I can be, that I would die if I let myself be drawn into the center of the fray, but just as certainly if I let go of the crowd. This is not an easy position to stay in, it is even very difficult to hold, for these beings are in constant motion and their movements are unpredictable and follow no rhythm. They swirl, go north, then suddenly east; none of the individuals in the crowd remains in the same place in relation to the others. So I too am in perpetual motion; all this demands a high level of tension, but it gives me a feeling of violent, almost vertiginous, happiness.” A very good schizo dream. 

roughcast

Millar’s invaluable guide gives a contemporary account of roughcast (or pebbledash) at the end of the Victorian era. The wall would first have been given a coat of ‘strong-haired coarse stuff’, that is to say a mortar of lime or hydraulic lime and aggregate with a high proportion of animal hair. This would then have been scratched to provide a good key. Next, when this coat had dried, a second coat of the same material, ‘well knocked up and of even consistency’ would have been applied, laid to an even surface ready for the shingle or other material to be dashed on. The material, he advised, should be well washed, passed through a quarter- to half-inch sieve, mixed with ‘hot lime (hydraulic for preference)’ and water in a tub. This suggests that quicklime was slaked with the pebbles, shale or gravel in it. When the second coat of render was ready, the material would then have been thrown quickly and evenly onto the soft surface using ‘a “scoop” or hollow trowel’, starting from the top and working downwards. The principal component of the finished surface is thus the pebbles or stone fragments with a thin coating of binder.

Alain Badiou, “On Beckett”
http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/wp-content/documents/Badiou%20on%20Beckett/Badiou%20-%20On%20Beckett.pdf
Alain Badiou, “On Beckett”
http://backdoorbroadcasting.net/wp-content/documents/Badiou%20on%20Beckett/Badiou%20-%20On%20Beckett.pdf
“The Odd Couple” by Otto Dix

“The Odd Couple” by Otto Dix

"I never could understand people like Tolstoy, in love with the family archives with their epic poems made of domestic memories. I repeat: my memory is not of love, but of hostility, and it labors not at reproducing, but at distancing the past. For an intellectual of mediocre background memory is useless, it would suffice for him to talk about the books he had read, and his biography would be complete. There, where for fortunate generations, the epic poem was spoken in hexametres and in chronicles, for me, there stands a gaping sign and between me and the century there lies an abyss, a ditch filled with time that murmurs. What did my family wish to say? I do not know. It had been stuttering since birth and yet it had something to say. This congenital stuttering weighs heavily on me and on many of my contemporaries. We were not taught to speak but to stammer - and only by listening to the swelling noise of the century and being bleached by the foam on the crest of its wave did we acquire a language."

— Osip Mandelstam

Tags: mandelstam

arthistorygoose:

I am writing a paper on court dwarfs in art so I figured I’d share some of my research. What we have here is Archduchess Isabella and her attendant dwarf, Magdalena Ruiz. Philip II refers to Ruiz in a letter written to his daughters, “I do not think Magdalena is so angry with me, but she has been sick for some days, and has taken a laxative and remains in a very bad mood. Yesterday she came here and looked very spiritless, and thin and old and deaf and half-senile. I think it is all from drinking…

~

Alonso Sánchez Coello

Portrait of Isabel Clara Eugenia and Magdalena Ruiz, c.1586

(Source: arthistorygoose-blog)

"

In the literary machine that Proust’s In Search of Lost Time constitutes, we are struck by the fact that all the parts are produced as asymmetrical sections, paths that suddenly come to an end, hermetically sealed boxes, noncommunicating vessels, watertight compartments, in which there are gaps even between things that are contiguous, gaps that are affirmations, pieces of a puzzle belonging not to any one puzzle but to many, pieces assembled by forcing them into a certain place where they may or may not belong, their unmatched edges violently bent out of shape, forcibly made to fit together, to interlock, with a number of pieces always left over. It is a schizoid work par excellence: it is almost as though the author’s guilt, his confessions of guilt are merely a sort of joke. (In Kleinian terms, it might be said that the depressive position is only a cover-up for a more deeply rooted schizoid attitude.) For the rigors of the law are only an apparent expression of the protest of the One, whereas their real object is the absolution of fragmented universes, in which the law never unites anything in a single Whole, but on the contrary measures and maps out the divergences, the dispersions, the exploding into fragments of something that is innocent precisely because its source is madness.

For what does in fact take place in In Search of Lost Time, one and the same story with infinite variations? It is clear that the narrator sees nothing, hears nothing, and that he is a body without organs, or like a spider poised in its web, observing nothing, but responding to the slightest sign, to the slightest vibration by springing on its prey. Everything begins with nebulae, statistical wholes whose outlines are blurred, molar or collective formations comprising singularities distributed haphazardly (a living room, a group of girls, a landscape). Then, within these nebulae or these collectives, “sides” take shape, series are arranged, persons figure in these series, under strange laws of lack, absence, asymmetry, exclusion, noncommunication, vice, and guilt. Next, everything becomes blurred again, everything comes apart, but this time in a molecular and pure multiplicity, where the partial objects, the “boxes,” the “vessels” all have their positive determinations, and enter into aberrant communication following a transversal that runs through the whole work; an immense flow that each partial object produces and cuts again, reproduces and cuts at the same time. More than vice, says Proust, it is madness and its innocence that disturb us. If schizophrenia is the universal, the great artist is indeed the one who scales the schizophrenic wall and reaches the land of the unknown, where he no longer belongs to any time, any milieu, any school.

Such is the case in an illustrative passage, the first kiss given Albertine. Albertine’s face is at first a nebula, barely extracted from the collective of girls. Then her person disengages itself, through a series of views that are like distinct personalities, with Albertine’s face jumping from one plane to another as the narrator’s lips draw nearer her cheek. At last, within the magnified proximity, everything falls apart like a face drawn in sand, Albertine’s face shatters into molecular partial objects, while those on the narrator’s face rejoin the body without organs, eyes closed, nostrils pinched shut, mouth filled.

"

— Deleuze and Guatarri, Anti-Oedipus

worshipingflows:
“ Of course we are challenging nature itself, and it hits back. It just hits back, that’s all and that’s grandiose about it, and we have to accept that it is much stronger than we are. Kinski always says it’s full of erotic elements....

worshipingflows:

Of course we are challenging nature itself, and it hits back. It just hits back, that’s all and that’s grandiose about it, and we have to accept that it is much stronger than we are. Kinski always says it’s full of erotic elements. I don’t see it so much erotic, I see it more full of obscenity, it’s just.. and nature here is vile and base. I wouldn’t see anything erotic here, I would see fornication and asphyxiation, and choking, and fighting for survival, and growing, and just rotting away. Of course there’s a lot of misery, but it is the same misery that is all around us. The trees here are in misery, and the birds are in misery - I don’t think they sing, they just screech in pain. Taking a close look at what’s around us, there is some sort of harmony, it’s the harmony of overwhelming and collective murder. And we in comparison with the articulate vileness and baseness and obscenity of all this jungle, we in comparison with that enormous articulation, we only sound like badly-pronounced and half-finished sentences out of a stupid suburban novel, a cheap novel. And we have to become humble in front of this overwhelming misery and overwhelming fornication, overwhelming growth and overwhelming lack of order. Even the stars up here look like a mess. There is no harmony in the universe, we have to get acquainted with this idea that there is no real harmony as we have conceived it. But when I say this, I say this all full of admiration for the jungle. It is not that I hate it, I love it. I love it very much, but I love it against my better judgement.

(Werner Herzog in “The Burden of Dreams”)

(Source: somaornothing)